I often don’t agree completely with the views Stephen Den Beste expresses over at USS Clueless, but I always respect the engineering-like rigor he draws on when formulating his views. He’s posted several thought provoking analyses of the Iraq situation over the past few days. Again, I don’t agree with everything he says, but I find he expresses himself a great deal more logically and rationally than much of the “no war, peace at any price” crowd manages to do.
This piece from today is possibly the best of the lot so far. If Stephen’s right, this explains a very great deal of what I’ve perceived as logical inconsistencies in the Bush approach to this conflict. Indeed, this is the only case I’ve read thus far that actually does make sense to me.
That isn’t to say I completely buy this argument, or have suddenly developed an enthusiasm for a war in Iraq. I think a lot of the other actions of the Bush administration on the international stage are inconsistent with the argument Stephen makes. I don’t see much evidence of this depth of strategic thinking on the part of the current U.S. government. I do think there’s a significant personal element in Bush’s desire to “get the guy who tried to kill my daddy.” I also don’t trust these assholes further than I can kick an anvil.
On the other hand, I feel a growing disgust over the antics of many in the anti-war movement. The “blood for oil” argument is totally spurious. The tactic of trying to silence Iraqi voices who are testifying as to the horrors Saddam Hussein has perpetrated on his own people because these voices detract from the political agenda of some of the far left is reprehensible. The anti-Semitism and hate speech from the anti-war crowd is every bit as disturbing in the cause of peace as it is in the cause of war. And please, people, can we knock off the pathetic street theater crap? It’s not only pathetic, it’s totally ineffective. Thank Ghu for voices like Senator Robert Byrd.
I’m deeply ambivalent about what’s going on. Saddam Hussein is clearly as crazy as a sack of assholes and the world would doubtless be a better place for his absence from it. Liberalization of Arab culture is something that needs to happen if we want to avoid a clash between their culture and ours that results in a whole big bunch of corpses. I’m just not sure that this is the best path. I’m not sure that this isn’t going to result in an increase in terrorism rather than a reduction. I don’t know that I believe that the end result of our current strategy will result in the democratization of the Middle East, even if we do end up with a more democratic Iraq.
I do want to go on record though, as having deep disdain for the French long before it was trendy to do so…

